Article Mobile Networks: Development, Purpose & Impact on Humans (Part 3) (1 Viewer)

  • Welcome to the Roundtable! If you have an account already, please sign in, otherwise feel free to register. Note that you will be unable to post or access some boards and information unless you sign in.

David Topi

Metaphysical & Spiritual Teacher
Jun 13, 2017
If someone could see us from above, but not see what we do or what we are, what we build or what we execute, but only what we think of as a huge mass of energy that would shape what humanity is achieving co-create, you would probably realize that there are social dynamics that always go in various directions, but linked by a common thread that seems to move our civilization in a certain direction.

Determining that direction and then being able to analyze the key elements of it is what would give us the opportunity to say with some objectivity where the personal, social and collective growth and development of our species is heading, and it is in some way what Our Higher Selves do when they look at the timelines to see which different scenarios, of all those that exist simultaneously, are the ones that are most likely to manifest at any moment on a physical level.

In some way, the questions that our Higher Selves “ask” themselves, in their terms, are of the style of are we growing in social consciousness? Are we kinder to each other? Do the people of Earth help and assist each other more? Can we say that we have become more humane or colder society, more distant or more artificial? Can we change the course of our growth if we knew how?

The mobile changed everything

We have already commented in previous articles that mobile technology has greatly changed our perception of reality and has largely isolated us from each other by moving all personal interaction towards the virtual world and social networks. But it is unnatural in a broad sense of the term, since the human being is a friendly, rational, collective and emotional being by nature, and that is "dangerous" for the RIC and CS, hence everything that was delivered and built that we have previously explained to diminish this “face-to-face” collaborative potential.

So, if we ask our Higher Selves: what perspectives are breaking through with a strong accent and a high degree of impact on the way we behave towards each other? undoubtedly they tell us that we are becoming much more introspective due to the use of mobile technology, since for years now we have been talking much less with the people around us, and even with our partner, if we have a mobile nearby with which to consult anything from any app at any time, whether we are at home or in a restaurant having dinner and celebrating our anniversary. We no longer ask for the address of how to go to a place to the locals because Google Maps indicates it without problems, and, in general, it is no longer necessary to speak with almost anybody to get something because we can fill out forms, do ordering online or sending emails that usually supply the role of direct conversation for the vast majority of things.

Nothing is good, nothing is bad; it is how things have happened

Like everything, I do not assess whether this is positive for us or not, my Higher Self has always taught me that nothing is "good" or "bad" per se, that everything depends on the use that is given and that each one uses and applies the technology and the comforts that it provides us as it sees fit, but it is a bird's-eye observation that, in the social sphere, we are becoming more and more secluded, each one in our particular universe without major interest in the particular universe of others beyond what is strictly necessary for daily living, work or family obligations. Of the rest, the mobile is usually in charge of it.

In this way society becomes more closed and less willing to embrace exchanges with other members from it, something already complicated by this current collective psychosis to infect us with the transmission of the virus, which affects all areas and mechanisms that make it work and leads us to depend more on technology than on our own psychology to be able to intuit or deal with someone about something. The emoticons from WhatApps, Telegram or Signal say much more about our state of mind than what our facial features indicate or how we have the eyes that day when we got up somewhat apathetic or low.

Therefore, wherever you look in the timelines, this trend does not decrease, but increases with each passing year and with each technological advance. The RIC and CS have achieved that something presented to make life easier for us is creating that we live life more isolated, something that often goes counter to how human beings have functioned throughout their history. It is not that we stop being “social,” we know how to cooperate in large numbers and in an efficient way, it is simply that at a minimum when we can avoid a relationship with the rest of our fellow human beings, we look for opportunities for it.

A great part of the responsibility is of the programming of our psyche

It is true that the responsibility for a large part of this situation lies with the psychological systems and programming of the human being, and the fears that these interrelationships with others harm us in some way. Sometimes it is not easy to deal with strangers, make them understand what we want to say or need, we do not want to put up with the mood of others, much less have to be behind them to solve or finish something, so it is entirely understandably we prefer to do everything more anonymously, more technologically, and with less strain than human interaction sometimes causes. Like everything, there are degrees in which a relationship with other members of our species can even be toxic, psychological and energetically speaking, while at other times they can be a balm of relief, encouragement, support or assistance.

But yes, the trend is to move towards our personal world with greater assiduity, and this trend begins to take shape from the first years of life because it is increasingly difficult to make friends in childhood that last until old age, and also in the macro sphere there is more reluctance for towns, societies and countries to maintain certain ties of friendship or brotherhood to each other, beyond the simple title that our cities "get along" or "fall sympathetic" can exchange with other cities.

So, and returning to the questions towards our Higher Self: do we have more consciousness now? Are we more developed at an evolutionary level than a year ago, three or twenty? In general, what is appreciated is that we maintain the same level of understanding of how the world, reality and the universe in which we live works. It is difficult for us to advance not only in scientific knowledge, but above all in human, psychological, and even spiritual knowledge, which is still a facet of the human being that although it cannot be measured in any way, is still present in life from all of us.

This “spiritual” and personal growth section, in addition, included in all the beliefs and systems of all the countries of the globe, becomes important when decoding how we appreciate other humans for what they are and what they do, beyond what they have or their social position. Few people usually find a way to see their peers more deeply than through the title or social class by which they present themselves to the world, and immediately thousands of completely subjective judgments are made about something or someone simply by appearance, way of showing or public image.

There are at times eons of distance between what someone shows and how someone really is, because we are masters of disguise in public behavior towards the outside that allows us to accommodate the mask of our personality that comes in handy at all times to deal with the situation we are facing. Therefore, judgments and critic are made, opined and spoken without having in almost all cases real data and knowledge of the why of something, the how of something or someone, and the what of that something or that someone. With this, we forge our own ideas and mental archetypes regarding the situation of the world, of the life of the neighbor or of the bakery of the neighborhood, while in reality none of those elements and people are or perceive themselves as the rest of the environment may be imagining them in their interior version.

Thus, society is becoming more individualistic locked in the virtual world that mobile technology provides us. If each time we opine and analyze the rest from a biased vision that gives us a partial idea of others according to what we know about these people from our virtual relationships with them, each time we find that we understand each other less. This way, it seems clear that the dynamics of the coming years will increase that reality and become even more what the RIC and CS have been creating for a long time: a world in which help and assistance are lacking towards each other, a world in which there is a lack of understanding of others and a world where each one prefers to go about his own rather than dedicate a little of his existence to assisting others.

However, it is not true; there is a lot of help from each other...

On the other hand, it is curious that just the opposite is true. That is to say, it is also true that if our Higher Selves from this bird's-eye view of humanity's time and evolutionary lines investigate a little more in detail, descending to the "street" level through their personality in the avatar and trying to find examples of this that we have just told, you can doubt the previous conclusions, because we see people who help others to cross the street, neighbors who help between themselves with house chores, we see some children giving some coins to someone who needs them, we see people say good morning as they walk side by side, and we see someone graciously picking up a product from the top shelf of the supermarket when someone else in need cannot reach it.

And then, after this vision, we would ask ourselves, what fails at the macro level that does not fail individually? How is it possible that, in general, there are many situations in which we can verify that the human being is kind, kind, empathetic and with a desire to help while, then, we see that society is going down paths that point to the contrary?

The answer is that individually, in general, we all fulfill our role as good people when we have the opportunity to do so, we do not deny help to those who ask for it and we usually collaborate with others when is needed and necessary. But we always put a limit, and we always do it if it is good for us to do it at that specific moment and in that precise situation, and, in general, not much more. It is only when it fits perfectly with the schedule, the agenda in the mobile, and does not interrupt any other action that keeps us within our particular universe, is when we dare, and usually, spontaneously, do small actions that serve to help others.

This should be the other way around, we should live life in a natural, social, shared and collaborative way, and we would get into our virtual world of the small screen only when there was nothing to do in that first way of living, but we do it the other way around, we raise our hands to give a product to someone who does not reach it or we help to cross the street to someone alone if we do not have to send a message, we do not have to read an article on the mobile or we do not have to check the status of our social networks. There, then, we are no longer social, kind or collaborative beings, basically because we disappear from the world isolating ourselves in our particular universe and we do not even see who needs a hand when passing by (not to mention those who stop worrying about their basic safety while crossing the street watching their mobile phones and not the cars), and, for this reason, at a macro level this social dynamic is perceived and at a micro level it can sometimes be verified that sometimes this is already the case, sometimes not. It is a matter of how much time you spend observing human behavior on a small scale and how much time you see the currents and analyze the dynamics to a greater degree.

It is a matter of balancing both "worlds"

This way of living is going to be really difficult to change because we have become addicted to fleeing the world, because the world “out there” does not really offer us too much of what we need to feel comfortable in it. But it is a psychological trap created by the RIC because the world "through the mobile" can be as we wish it to be, and we forget that we have the power through personal interaction with other human beings to alter and modify the reality in which we live if we do not like the way it looks now.

The screens, the distractions, the marathons series on Netflix, the long hours in Facebook and, in general, everything that the virtual world now offers us, and I am not saying that it is bad or that it is good, is what causes the disconnection and the "evolutionary" decline of humanity, while, on the other hand, we cannot deny that it is a positive thing to read a book that explains something to us through our tablet or watch a documentary that helps us better understand a topic through television. That is not the problem, but the priorities and what goes first in the life of a person, because the virtual world has been consolidated as first to manage our life and then, if anything, comes the real world to rest the eyes and mind a little until we can get back to it.

For this same reason, it is important that we can influence the balance of both "worlds" a little, that we put the accent and the force on the enjoyment of the physical, the relationships between people, going out to do activities wherever (when they let us leave home and the "confinement" is over), escape from technology when possible and teach our children to use it as a support tool for the needs of their lives and not as a place of escape and live for all their lives.

The most complicated task is for parents

Parents, on our side, we may have to re-learn to live as we did before mobile phones existed and to use them as keys are used, as I said in the deprogramming articles that I have mentioned in the previous post. I think many of you have read that those who know the most about technology, those "CEOs" from the Silicon Valley are those who use it the least. When I was working in Brussels at a telecommunications company as an engineer, our director and CEO only wanted to use fixed line, aware of what the mobile entailed, its energy impact that we have already explained, its “dangerousness.” etc.

If we could get it to be a device that when you need it, take it, do what you have to do, and return it to its place without worrying if within two minutes a new message could arrive or someone has updated its social profile, we will have taken a good step to loosen part of the RIC's control over us. If we achieve that, a really difficult objective, we will be on the path of manifesting at the micro level something that, little by little, perhaps in decades, depending on how many people join this way of regaining control of their reality and human interaction, it must be manifested at the macro level as a better understanding between peoples, cultures and societies, without falling into the naiveté that everything will be solved with the stroke of a pen and no conflict will ever occur again, because it would not be true, since many others Interests are at stake in these scenarios and the RIC and CS will always look for ways to isolate us more and more and keep us constantly confronting each other.

Still, it would be a first step and a huge achievement if we were at least to move part of the time spent in our inner virtual world to the real outer world. Time will tell us if there is a way to balance the scale, and then we will see if we can reorganize the style of doing things based on it. We will see in the next and last article in this series something more about how to reduce the energy impact that mobile electromagnetic emissions have on us, which we have explained in the previous two articles, and I hope that we have been able to see the double edge of everything that the RIC always delivers us as something that makes life more comfortable and easy, but at a high cost for everything else.

A hug,

David Topí

The article above has been translated from Spanish to English by Carl. Minor editorial changes made by Laron. David has given direct permission to share his articles in this manner.

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). You’re allowed to share this article for non-commercial purposes, but you must not edit or modify the contents. You must include all links and images, as well as provide appropriate credit — which includes a link leading directly back to this article at the top of your re-post. You must also include this licence information.

About the Author
David Topi is an engineer, multifaceted writer, trainer and therapist. One of his main areas of focus is educating and helping people through spiritual and personal processes. He is an energy healer and uses the “Akashic” healing technique. He is trained in metaphysics, alternative methods, inherent spiritual abilities and in personal deployment systems that allow humans to express their maximum potential and find answers for their questions. Back in 2013 he created EMEDT, Metaphysics and Transpersonal Deployment School, to provide a framework, organised and structured to the training he teaches. The website for David Topi's Spanish based Metaphysics and Transpersonal Deployment School can be found here, David Topi's home page can be found here,
  • Insightful Post
Reactions: Siggie

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)