Article Interdependence Between Numbers and Mental Archetypes (1 Viewer)

  • Welcome to the Roundtable! If you have an account already, please sign in, otherwise feel free to register. Note that you will be unable to post or access some boards and information unless you sign in.

David Topi

Metaphysical & Spiritual Teacher
Jun 13, 2017
Since the drawings we use for numbers are a “human” convection and decision and have been developed by various civilizations throughout our history, as we have seen in the last article, these will not change, or it does not seem that for the moment we are going to do it, keeping "fixed" the graphics that we use to represent each quantity.


But that does not mean that the energy of the “numerical” field that this symbol imbues and represents does not change, and that is something that has been altering over the centuries and that, at the moment, is far from the initial energies and archetypes that we had for each number when our Sumerian, Assyrian or Egyptian ancestors studied or developed their numerological and mathematical knowledge with them.

In the same way that when we have an element connected to another, such as an irrigation pipe connected to a tap, the outlet nozzle of the irrigation pipe is always a fixed and unalterable element, but what can flow through it depends on what is "injected" at the other end where the tap is located. That is, although the number as a symbol is unchanged (the element "hose mouth"), the energetic fluid that circulates and to which this hose connects varies as the planetary structures and their energies change, the mental fields where the archetypes, the "data fields" associated with numbers, etc.

To understand this better, it is necessary to remember the explanations that we have been giving over the years about the structure of our planet in its first three levels, and analyze where “the water” is found, which then circulates through the hose until it reaches “the mouth of the hose".

The journey from the mental to the physical part

We already know that the Earth has its physical part and its "energetic" part. The physical and solid plane is the densest base of the planet's structure that we inhabit, and there are many other levels that are not physical or perceptible to our senses or technologies that complete the entire structure of the planet. If the "hose mouth" in our example is on the physical plane, the "pipe" or hose itself is on the etheric plane, which corresponds to the second structural level in density and materiality. This etheric plane, as you already know, contains all the "energetic" structures that make up the physical plane, and all the energy from the higher planes of the Earth in order to "densify" and become something "solid" must "descend" from the mental and superior planes towards the physical passing through the etheric plane and its "pipes".

Then, if the physical plane is the densest part and then we have the etheric plane, between these two there are particles of an energy field that we know as the "astral substrate," just as they also exist between the etheric and the next level, the mental plane, where there are again particles of astral substrate that serves as "glue" so that all the planes and levels are well cohesive with each other.

Thus, the next level structured after the previous two is the mental plane or field, in which all the “mental forms,” ideas, concepts, archetypes, thoughts, knowledge, etc., of everything that “exists” are accumulated on an etheric and physical level. For that reason, the concept that "two" means "such a thing,” is encoded in the "two" archetype of the mental plane, and that a physical "house" that represents something else, is also encoded in the "house" archetype" of the same mental plane.

This way, and as we can imagine, each meaning for each symbol, each drawing, each number, each word, each "thing" that we can use, is "saved," encoded, programmed and filed in its corresponding "field of knowledge" and mental archetype, and, if you change the concept or change the content of the archetype of "that," it changes its energy, its encoding, its vibration, the way in which it can be used or stop being used, the way in which affects the lower planes through resonance, etc.

And all this without having changed in the physical plane the graphics or symbolism of what we are representing, although the word "house" has a meaning now, for example, different from the one it had twenty thousand years ago (from cave to brick building for example), and the symbol of five currently has a different meaning, or a bit different from the meaning it had in ancient Egypt or in any other previous time.

Why do the archetypal meanings and contents of things vary?

They vary because these meanings and concepts are associated with frequencies and vibrations, and depend on the particles and the content imbued with them that form those archetypes located on the mental plane, so that, with the passing of the centuries the planetary structure of all its planes have changed enormously in frequency, so the particles that form the field of concepts that represents the "nine," for example, have varied enormously with respect to how that "field" was in the past and the content it contained.

Furthermore, people, with the influence of our psyche and collective unconscious, which is located equally on the same mental plane where all other fields of knowledge and concepts are located, have also influenced and changed (partially) the content of the numerical archetypes.

For this reason, when in a psychological study, for example, three thousand years ago, we could say that a person presented "such" qualities, "such" and "such" due to the numerological reduction of his name, date of birth, and other numerical data that define us all, now those psychological traits, based on the result that the numbers give us for that person, are something or quite different, depending on the combination of archetypes and how much they have altered, changed or modified the concepts they represent in these last three or five thousand years.

This does not mean that everything we know about numbers is incorrect, or that the thousands of numerology books that have been published throughout history are completely wrong or out of date, but it does mean that, our Higher Selves say, there are quite a few corrections and enough updates to be made to many of the concepts, definitions and combinatorial results to update the "current" explanations and representations to the "usual" numbers, according to the content now present in the collective unconscious, in the sets of numerical fields in our mental plane and according to the vibration in these moments of the planes, structures and energy systems of our planet, of our race and of our evolutionary vehicles.

A hug,

David Topí

The article above has been translated from Spanish to English by Carl. Minor editorial changes made by Laron. David has given direct permission to share his articles in this manner.

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). You’re allowed to share this article for non-commercial purposes, but you must not edit or modify the contents. You must include all links and images, as well as provide appropriate credit — which includes a link leading directly back to this article at the top of your re-post. You must also include this licence information.

About the Author
David Topi is an engineer, multifaceted writer, trainer and therapist. One of his main areas of focus is educating and helping people through spiritual and personal processes. He is an energy healer and uses the “Akashic” healing technique. He is trained in metaphysics, alternative methods, inherent spiritual abilities and in personal deployment systems that allow humans to express their maximum potential and find answers for their questions. Back in 2013 he created EMEDT, Metaphysics and Transpersonal Deployment School, to provide a framework, organised and structured to the training he teaches. The website for David Topi's Spanish based Metaphysics and Transpersonal Deployment School can be found here, David Topi's home page can be found here,
  • Intriguing Post
Reactions: Lila


Collected Consciousness
Staff member
RT Supporter
Global Moderator
Board Moderator
Jul 28, 2016
I find this concept intriguing; that numbers can change what they mean. And I find it simultaneously well grounded.

Just as the expression 'like digging up potatoes in a potatoe field' now means little to so many yet it was used as an expression initially since 'everybody' knew what it was like to think you had dug up every last potatoe in a field only to find that, amazingly, even if you were sure you'd sifted through every last potatoe, there were plenty left if you went back to try again. This quality of potatoes also means that there are always new potatoes even after you think you've dug them all up :cool:
So, even if this expression means little to so many now it became an expression because the picture it created in people's minds at that time was drawn from such a universally experienced situation that it was easily understood.

Similarly, one can change an insult into a welcome attribute simply by owning it, if it fits. I absolutely love to see this in action. It's rare and when it happens it instantly transforms a situation in such a beautiful way.
I can recall someone being called pushy and, after a moment's pause, agreeing and owning that pushiness, saying forcefully and loudly (as a pushy person might) that when something was important enough it was time to be pushy and this situation was important enough to be pushy because... As a result, the person doing the insulting (also known to have pushy moments:ROFL:) became quiet and completely backed off, in fact, a while later, found some positive attributes in the concept of 'pushiness', saying something about how it was an attribute of strong individuals and that it could make important things happen when they needed to happen. So, from being an insult, pushiness became a desirable trait, all in the space of a few seconds. And all people in that room during the argument-that-turned-into-an-agreement left the room with an entirely transformed idea of what it meant, or could mean, to be pushy.
This is perhaps a funny example. I'm hoping it's concrete enough to communicate how our concept of things can change 'on a dime'.

The beauty of these moments seems to lie that in the acceptance of one's 'fault' or 'negative quality' one is able to see it as part of one's self that can be there or not by choice. In that way, the quality, eg pushiness, becomes a choice in any given moment. One can be pushy when it is needed and accepting, or soft (or whatever one thinks the opposite is) just as easily in the next moment.
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)