I have been thinking about this interview overnight. When someone strikes a match in the dark, the glimmer takes your attention. I could feel the sincerity of the man, but I wonder how gullible he may be? He does not have access to military might, not that we want the world to go down that path, but his opponents, the ones he is threatening to expose, do have that access, via the presidential heads of countries that they control (many masses of them). I feel that he must have "other" backing, our friends from other places, perhaps? Also, it concerned me about his close relationship with Michael Jackson, and his pinning his hopes on President Trump coming over to his effort. I feel that both of those characters/identities are narcissistic, wounded people who play a game for their best advantage. Another thing that worried me, was his continual insistence that he does not want to start conflict, but opposing the most powerful elite in itself spells conflict. Brave, but wise? I think he is someone who has been in back rooms with some very nasty types, and that must have contributed to his awakening. Sorry, Alain, to mention it, but we know those small city states of Lichtenstein and the principality of Monaco, and small country of Luxembourg have been home to some of the very powerful elite, money masters over the centuries. Bankers and worse. Also, the southern, Mediterranean facing parts of France such as Nice, which are nexus hubs for elites holidaying in the sun.
Is this man, Philippe Argillier, just a frontispiece to a much weightier book, or is he inconsequential? Time will only tell. But hope in the hearts of a few can grow.