This is one of the clips by the Arcturian blessing Teal Swan I enjoyed the most, because it sheds light on one of the most important relationships in this realm. She says that it would be incredibly rare for people not to have at least one of those thought-forms of lacking attached to them.
So, they attack to people with lack, trying to empower them in a way that would feed both parties. There was an example of a lady who wants to be loved, so she becomes seductive, unconsciously attracting the demon of Lust and probably making a very effective team along the way.
However, that relationship is dangerous because it is related to losing free will, giving it up to the demon who will always want more because its very existence is based on the concept of lack. So, the recommended course of action is to make the host whole again by feeding it with love so that the demon would not have a place to attach and go away.
Teal also mentions that some people would like to deal with the demon itself. Exorcism might work, but if the lack in the person is still there, that would be only a temporary solution. Instead, she recommends loving the demon too, setting it free from the burden of lack that is its very essence.
How do you do that? That is an interesting question. I just ask what if that seductress actually meets her true love this way? What if Wrath allows a person to stand on their own ground and not allow others to make them their slaves. In that case, over time Wrath would make the person cause too much damage to the host and others, but in a moment, it might be the best solution to a problem that needs a dire solution. How could one not love that?
As somebody who probably was a warrior in other incarnations, I guess Wrath is one of the thought-forms I might know better than others, and I can say it is based on fear of annihilation or enslavement. I don't perceive Wrath as evil, but it tends to overreact a lot, lol.
Teal also says that spiritual communities can sometimes create the conditions for demonic attachments, like the discouragement of sexual expression in Christianity, or like the modern spiritual communities which are all about making people believe they are whole, when in fact they are not.
Biblical terms tend to confuse me, which is understandable, I think. I thought Lucifer was the embodiment of freedom, as the opposite of the god of slavery. Teal says the opposite, and it actually makes more sense, I think. I really don't know this guy.
And so, Christ is the embodiment of the freedom to love. I lost that connection when I lost my religion a couple of years ago, but maybe I have not taken a path that is very much away from him since then. But I would insist on calling him Immanuel, as a sign of respect.