Research shows removing pubic hair is bad for your health (1 Viewer)

  • Welcome to the Roundtable! If you have an account already, please sign in, otherwise feel free to register. Note that you will be unable to post or access some boards and information unless you sign in.

Laron

QHHT & Past Life Regression
Staff member
Administrator
Creator of transients.info & The Roundtable
Jul 19, 2016
7,455
15,607
Nelson, New Zealand
laron.nz
By Kalee Brown via CE (Posted in full with permission)

"Grooming your pubic hair today seems to be just as popular as cutting the hair on your head. Whether you’ve trimmed it, waxed it, sugared it, or shaved it, numerous people feel the need to remove or decrease the hair in between their legs, particularly women.

The media and society encourage women to remove practically all of their hair and many of us succumb to this pressure, but how does that affect our health? A recent study published in the British Medical Journal’s publication on Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) explored the correlation between pubic hair and STIs.

Trimming Your Pubes May Increase Your Risk of STIs
A recent study in the U.S. found a positive correlation between STIs and pubic hair grooming. Researchers surveyed 7,580 people between the ages of 18 and 65 years old, 56% of whom were men and 44% women. The survey determined participants’ sexual history, previous STIs, and pubic hair maintenance.

74% of those surveyed — 66% of men and 84% of women — stated they groomed their pubes. This isn’t necessarily surprising, as getting Brazilians and shaving has become a social norm, especially for women. The participants’ tool of choice was either the electric razor, which 42% of men used, the average razor, which 61% of women chose, or scissors, which approximately 25% of each group preferred.

The researchers then grouped the individuals who groomed their pubes into two categories: “extreme groomers,” or those who removed all of their pubic hair more than 11 times per year, and “high-frequency groomers,” those who trimmed it on a daily or weekly basis. Of the people surveyed, 17% were considered extreme groomers and 22% high-frequency groomers.

13% of the participants stated they have had herpes, human papilloma virus (HPV), syphilis, molluscum, gonorrhoea, chlamydia, HIV, or pubic lice. Regardless of how often they removed their pubic hair, the results showed that groomers had an 80% greater risk of contracting an STI after taking their age and total amount of sexual partners into consideration.

In addition, the extreme and high-frequency groomers were considered four times more likely to contract an STI than non-groomers. These groomers were found to be more susceptible to STIs contracted through skin-to-skin contact, including herpes and HPV. The researchers also found that those who didn’t groom their pubic hair were more likely to have a lice infestation down there. So, for those of you who groom for cleanliness reasons, there may be some scientific basis to that!

Interestingly enough, extreme groomers were found to have had sex with significantly more partners than any other group surveyed. This begs the question: Is there a correlation between pubic hair removal and increased number of sexual partners?

It’s important to note that groomers could easily nick themselves while doing so, which may be a contributing factor for contracting STIs in the first place, since having any sort of open wound makes you more susceptible to bacteria and viruses.

When Did We Start Hating Pubic Hair?
Contrary to popular belief, pubic hair removal gained popularity well before this century. In ancient Greek, Egyptian, and Indian art, many females had little to no hair between their legs. The same trend can be found in Renaissance Italian art as well, as many females were portrayed with no pubic hair (source).

It’s unclear whether or not the artists actually painted their realities; however, even if they didn’t paint exactly what they were seeing, the desire to see a woman without pubic hair was still apparent.

The number of females who removed their pubic hair significantly increased with the start of the new millennium. From the 1970s until 2000, most explicit magazines such as Playboy featured women with pubic hair. However, since 2000, most pornography and explicit magazines have depicted the women with absolutely none.

An Indiana University study found that pubic hair removal is largely based on age. Their findings suggest that the younger the woman, the more likely she is to completely remove her pubes. For example, 21% of women aged 18-24 removed everything “down there,” whereas only 2% of women over 50 did so.

There are numerous reasons for this correlation. Hair removal could simply be a trend amongst millennials, or perhaps the older the woman, the more comfortable she is in her own body. However, the majority of the participants in this study stated that their decision was just that, their decision. Their amount of pubic hair was not contingent on their partner’s or society’s opinions, but rather their own.

Learn to Love Your Pubes or Lose ‘Em — Who Cares!
The first time I was peer pressured into ditching my pubes was at a very young age. I falsely presumed that men would only be attracted to me if my entire body was smooth and hairless, so I spent years of my life falling into the “high-frequency groomer” category as discussed above. This was a direct result of the propaganda, media, and societal pressures I (along with billions of other women) was subject to.

The media tries to convince you that beauty is only skin deep and that in order to be beautiful, a woman must have skin as bald as a naked mole rat. There are also cultural expectations regarding hair removal; for example, many European women don’t shave or wax.

Whether you choose to remove your hair or keep it there, make your decision for you. Yes, the universe blessed you with hair there for a reason, but that doesn’t make it wrong to remove it!"​
 

Vickie

Roaming Contributor
Retired Moderator
Jul 23, 2016
922
2,709
Arkansas, USA
The extreme groomers are obviously having sex with many partners if they are four times more likely to contract an STD. It's probably not the grooming that's giving them the STDs, it's having sex with many partners and they keep passing diseases around. The percentages in this article indicate that a condom is not being used when they have many partners and that's not good. The article doesn't take into account people that groom but have one partner.
 
Last edited:

Out of Time

Roaming Contributor
Sep 5, 2016
617
1,757
Lol, this forum proves to be a place where you can get information about a wide variety of topics and meet all sorts of characters (I assume I must be one of the more weird ones).

On the topic, I don't think it is very comfortable to have a lot of hair anywhere. And, it is true that co-relation does not equal causality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Laron

Snowmelt

Snowmelt
Staff member
RT Supporter
Board Moderator
Aug 15, 2016
5,325
13,885
Perth, Western Australia
I learned to love my armpit hair and my pubes in the colourful hippie commune life. If a tuft happened to make an appearance while I was dancing and throwing my arms around, my head did not compute as it was bobbing to the beat!

Today, I look through the generational window to the life of teens, and see narcissism and extreme hair removal walking hand-in-hand. However, I maintain a self-imposed gag on the topic, much as I dislike it, as I think it is 1) personal choice; and 2) a phase which will pass like any other. I hope I'm right!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)