I've done some basic remote viewing using an online website, where images are chosen a bit like what Rulz linked to, and had some good success with that (it's been a few years). A couple of months ago I had a friend ask me to remote view an object. I picked up on the pattern of the object straight away, not even thinking it would have had one in the first place, and also the color was similar.
But otherwise, this is not something I've done much of. I do keep up with the work of others, such as Courtney Brown at Farsight (I have one of his books). I've followed Farsight pretty extensively. I'm also aware of Ed Dames' work, including the events leading up to the solar kill shot as I keep an eye out for the final three, as if I remember right, there are only 3 left.
I've never personally seen it as an important ability to master, to be honest, when there are other psychic abilities I'm more interested in, and which I consider more valuable.
I have no interest in the future, as I spent a lot of time focusing on the future and learnt a lot about how things can easily change, even with a strong probable future. I like to see remote viewing used to help people, such as the authorities when trying to solve a case, or even for the public looking for help on something.
What I also appreciate about remote viewing is that it's not hard to learn, especially if you have the natural talent. If one is already on the spiritual path and are meditating, along with many other activities, that can greatly help with RVing.
Funny you picked that. When we did do a group RV session here, as
Sinera says, in 2016, the target picked was Mt Fuji
Ben's group sessions was a big success and I think the way it ran worked very well. If I remember right, it wasn't about making guesses, it was reporting what you got, and that was it from your side, and then the target was revealed after the date had passed. I think it was a fun experience for all those who took part.
Rulz brings up some important points though, as doing a group session is slow in comparison to other ways of learning. You could have a week to do a group session with only one target. I think a better way to run a group, so that there is much more practice going on, is to have multiple targets, so say five targets, and a week to view all five. This will give people time to do it, and they could do one a day for example. Most people don't have time to dedicate to this, so when you have a week, or so, it encourages more to participate.
Personally I would not be interested in anything related to sports.
Same here, I stopped watching any form of sport many yeas ago now and have no interest in gambling. I find sport is a huge distraction, a bit like consumerism, TV, radio, MSM, advertising (for consumerism), social media, etc. All these things are heavily manipulated to control the masses, which pull people in and distract them from, well, spirituality.
I encourage anyone to jump in here and start a remote viewing activity, if the person feels it will be successful of course, otherwise it may be a waste of their time. Just note though, that if it's too complicated, people will get turned off. If it requires a lot of time, again, that will turn people away, or those that join may not realize how much time they didn't have, and end up not completing the task(s). I think this was why that group project that Ben ran went so well, as it was easy to just dedicate 20 minutes, or whatever, to complete the task. (But like I said, it would be better to have multiple targets, so people get more practice in).
I think I already said this on Ben's old thread, but it would be good to encourage people to not just put their response to the target in public, but in a private message if they don't feel comfortable, as some people don't want to be wrong, and look like a failure in public.
Also, what comes to me now is that I think it makes a difference when you have direct human interaction behind the target. What I am really referring to here, is that software can generate a target, and then the consciousness sets out to identify it, yet it was not consciousness that was behind the target, but software. However, I have seen AI based software to some amazing things, and which showed me that it was very similar to being a form of consciousness, and this is why things like tarot online, and remote viewing with software based targets can work, but, it would be more successful, in my opinion, to have a human behind the targets for practicing, as it would provide more chance of success.
